| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 7 | |
| 2. |  | BORTOLOZO, F. R.; FROEHNER, S. J.; PARRON, L. M. Dinâmica de pesticidas em campos hidrófilos de altitude na região dos Campos Gerais do Paraná: resultados preliminares. In: EVENTO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA DA EMBRAPA FLORESTAS, 12., 2013, Colombo. Anais. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas, 2013. (Embrapa Florestas. Documentos, 253). Editores técnicos: Marcílio José Thomazini, Elenice Fritzsons, Patrícia Raquel Silva, Guilherme Schnell e Schuhli, Denise Jeton Cardoso, Luziane Franciscon. EVINCI. Resumos.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
|    |
| 3. | | BORTOLOZZO, F. R.; FROEHNER, S.; PARRON, L. M. Diagnóstico ambiental de uma nascente na cabeceira de drenagem do Rio Tibagi, Municipio de Ponta Grossa: análise preliminar. In: SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE RECURSOS HÍDRICOS, 20., 2013, Bento Gonçalves. Água, desenvolvimento econômico e socioambiental. Porto Alegre, RS: Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos, 2013. 7 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| 4. | | SÁNEZ, J.; FROEHNER, S.; HANSEL, F. A.; PARRON, L. M.; KNAPIK, H.; FERNANDES, C.; RIZZI, J. Bile acids combined with fecal sterols: a multiple biomarker approach for deciphering fecal pollution using river sediments. Journal of Soils and Sediments, v. 17, n. 3, p. 861-872, Mar. 2017.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
|  |
| 6. | | SCHLEDER, A. A.; PARRON, L. M.; HANSEL, F. A.; FROEHNER, S.; PALAGANO, L. T.; ROSA FILHO, E. F. da. Evaluation of occurrence of NO3-, coliform and atrazine in a karst aquifer, Colombo, PR. Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos, Porto Alegre, v. 22, e20, 2017.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 7 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
17/02/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
17/04/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
SÁNEZ, J.; FROEHNER, S.; HANSEL, F. A.; PARRON, L. M.; KNAPIK, H.; FERNANDES, C.; RIZZI, J. |
|
Afiliação: |
Juan Sánez, UFPR, Graduate Program in Water Resources and Environmental Engineering; Sandro Froehner, UFPR, Department of Environmental Engineering; FABRICIO AUGUSTO HANSEL, CNPF; LUCILIA MARIA PARRON VARGAS, CNPF; Heloise Knapik, UFPR, Graduate Program in Water Resources and Environmental Engineering; Cristóvão Fernandes, UFPR, Graduate Program in Water Resources and Environmental Engineering; Juliane Rizzi, UFPR, Graduate Program in Water Resources and Environmental Engineering. |
|
Título: |
Bile acids combined with fecal sterols: a multiple biomarker approach for deciphering fecal pollution using river sediments. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Soils and Sediments, v. 17, n. 3, p. 861-872, Mar. 2017. |
|
DOI: |
10.1007/s11368-016-1592-1 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Purpose: Fecal sterols (FSs) and bile acids (BAs) are biomarkers that can be used to track sewage pollution. These biomarkers offer an alternative to microbiological analyses, which have several weaknesses, including a lack of specificity. FSs are recognized fecal biomarkers, but there are very few studies showing the use of BAs as a fecal tracer, especially in river sediments, to the best of our knowledge. Thus, the aim of this work was to determine the response of BAs as an alternative biomarker of fecal pollution in parallel to FSs in freshwater sediments and use both biomarker groups to decipher the potential fecal pollution sources in a subtropical river. Materials and methods: Eight BAs and six FSs were extracted from sediments of the Iguassu River, southern Brazil, and analyzed by GC-MS. Results and discussion Among the sterols, coprostanol was dominant (20?4488 μg g−1), followed by stigmastanol (8.67?1788 μg g−1) and cholesterol (4.64?881 μg g−1). 3α- Deoxycholic acid (3α-DCA) was the predominant BA (1.63? 871 μg g−1), followed by 3α-lithocholic acid (3α-LCA) (1.77?170 μg g−1). The trends of the total BA and FS contents were different. Very few correlations between the individual BAs and FSs were found, probably due to their different environmental transformation processes and origins, whether animal or human. This watershed encompasses a mixture of land uses, including agricultural applications involving manure and composted sewage sludge as fertilizers and urban occupation, including several treated and untreated sewage discharges. When FS ratios were applied, most sites tested positive for human fecal pollution. Different ratios using secondary and primary BAs were assessed, e.g., (3β-LCA + 3α- LCA)/(3β-DCA + 3α-DCA), 3α-LCA/3α-DCA, and 3α- DCA/CDA. Most ratios detected the influences of different land uses and inputs along the river, including treated and untreated sewage. Furthermore, at the site considered to have moderate fecal pollution, the ratios were in contrast to those obtained from the sites with heavier fecal pollution. Conclusions: Bile acids and fecal sterols were successfully applied to decipher different origins of fecal pollution using sediments. The contents of individual BAs and derived ratios detected the different land uses and inputs along the river, distinguishing regions with low to high fecal pollution. In general, BAs and FSs did not appear to be strongly related, individually, or as a ratio. However, each compound class provides different information, and using both provides a clearer picture of the potential sources of fecal pollution, especially for a mixed land use region. MenosPurpose: Fecal sterols (FSs) and bile acids (BAs) are biomarkers that can be used to track sewage pollution. These biomarkers offer an alternative to microbiological analyses, which have several weaknesses, including a lack of specificity. FSs are recognized fecal biomarkers, but there are very few studies showing the use of BAs as a fecal tracer, especially in river sediments, to the best of our knowledge. Thus, the aim of this work was to determine the response of BAs as an alternative biomarker of fecal pollution in parallel to FSs in freshwater sediments and use both biomarker groups to decipher the potential fecal pollution sources in a subtropical river. Materials and methods: Eight BAs and six FSs were extracted from sediments of the Iguassu River, southern Brazil, and analyzed by GC-MS. Results and discussion Among the sterols, coprostanol was dominant (20?4488 μg g−1), followed by stigmastanol (8.67?1788 μg g−1) and cholesterol (4.64?881 μg g−1). 3α- Deoxycholic acid (3α-DCA) was the predominant BA (1.63? 871 μg g−1), followed by 3α-lithocholic acid (3α-LCA) (1.77?170 μg g−1). The trends of the total BA and FS contents were different. Very few correlations between the individual BAs and FSs were found, probably due to their different environmental transformation processes and origins, whether animal or human. This watershed encompasses a mixture of land uses, including agricultural applicatio... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Biomarcador; Fecal biomarker; Fecal sterols; Multimolecular approach; Poluição fecal. |
|
Thesagro: |
Contaminação; Rio; Sedimento. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Bile acids; Sediment contamination. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
W Química e Física |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03730naa a2200325 a 4500
001 2064663
005 2017-04-17
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1007/s11368-016-1592-1$2DOI
100 1 $aSÁNEZ, J.
245 $aBile acids combined with fecal sterols$ba multiple biomarker approach for deciphering fecal pollution using river sediments.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
520 $aPurpose: Fecal sterols (FSs) and bile acids (BAs) are biomarkers that can be used to track sewage pollution. These biomarkers offer an alternative to microbiological analyses, which have several weaknesses, including a lack of specificity. FSs are recognized fecal biomarkers, but there are very few studies showing the use of BAs as a fecal tracer, especially in river sediments, to the best of our knowledge. Thus, the aim of this work was to determine the response of BAs as an alternative biomarker of fecal pollution in parallel to FSs in freshwater sediments and use both biomarker groups to decipher the potential fecal pollution sources in a subtropical river. Materials and methods: Eight BAs and six FSs were extracted from sediments of the Iguassu River, southern Brazil, and analyzed by GC-MS. Results and discussion Among the sterols, coprostanol was dominant (20?4488 μg g−1), followed by stigmastanol (8.67?1788 μg g−1) and cholesterol (4.64?881 μg g−1). 3α- Deoxycholic acid (3α-DCA) was the predominant BA (1.63? 871 μg g−1), followed by 3α-lithocholic acid (3α-LCA) (1.77?170 μg g−1). The trends of the total BA and FS contents were different. Very few correlations between the individual BAs and FSs were found, probably due to their different environmental transformation processes and origins, whether animal or human. This watershed encompasses a mixture of land uses, including agricultural applications involving manure and composted sewage sludge as fertilizers and urban occupation, including several treated and untreated sewage discharges. When FS ratios were applied, most sites tested positive for human fecal pollution. Different ratios using secondary and primary BAs were assessed, e.g., (3β-LCA + 3α- LCA)/(3β-DCA + 3α-DCA), 3α-LCA/3α-DCA, and 3α- DCA/CDA. Most ratios detected the influences of different land uses and inputs along the river, including treated and untreated sewage. Furthermore, at the site considered to have moderate fecal pollution, the ratios were in contrast to those obtained from the sites with heavier fecal pollution. Conclusions: Bile acids and fecal sterols were successfully applied to decipher different origins of fecal pollution using sediments. The contents of individual BAs and derived ratios detected the different land uses and inputs along the river, distinguishing regions with low to high fecal pollution. In general, BAs and FSs did not appear to be strongly related, individually, or as a ratio. However, each compound class provides different information, and using both provides a clearer picture of the potential sources of fecal pollution, especially for a mixed land use region.
650 $aBile acids
650 $aSediment contamination
650 $aContaminação
650 $aRio
650 $aSedimento
653 $aBiomarcador
653 $aFecal biomarker
653 $aFecal sterols
653 $aMultimolecular approach
653 $aPoluição fecal
700 1 $aFROEHNER, S.
700 1 $aHANSEL, F. A.
700 1 $aPARRON, L. M.
700 1 $aKNAPIK, H.
700 1 $aFERNANDES, C.
700 1 $aRIZZI, J.
773 $tJournal of Soils and Sediments$gv. 17, n. 3, p. 861-872, Mar. 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
